It’s 11:36 p.m. on a Thursday night. You’ve just finished bingeing a series on Netflix, and instead of calling it a night, you open a dating app—maybe Tinder, Bumble, Hinge, or even a new Gen Z favorite. You start swiping. Some matches feel exciting. Others disappear into the void. But underneath all this digital mingling, a deeper shift is underway—one that affects how we date, how we see intimacy, and how we keep ourselves safe.
The “hookup economy” powered by dating apps is not just a millennial or Gen Z phenomenon, it’s a tech-enabled cultural engine that’s changing how relationships are formed, how we communicate, and what we expect from one another. It’s thrilling, yes. But it’s also unsettling. Because for every romantic success story, there’s a shadow side of ghosting, catfishing, exploitation, and emotional burnout.
As someone who has lived through these digital trenches—and heard more than a few personal testimonies from friends—I think it’s time we step back and ask: What are these apps really doing to us? And what moral responsibilities do they (and we) have in this brave new dating world?
The Illusion of Infinite Choice
Let’s begin with the most obvious: dating apps have made it seem like options are endless. That person didn’t reply after your amazing banter? No worries—there are 200 more potential matches within a 10km radius. This abundance, while seductive, creates a paradox: the more options we have, the less likely we are to commit to any.
We’ve started treating people like products—something you swipe past, something you sample and discard. “Dating fatigue” is real, and so is the loneliness that can follow an overload of superficial connections. Apps incentivise quick judgments: a picture, a tagline, maybe a clever GIF. Rarely do they encourage depth.
This isn’t a tech failure—it’s a human one amplified by tech. The platforms mirror our biases, our fears, and our desires back to us. And while the dream is to find love or connection, the reality is that many users are trapped in a loop of matching, chatting, ghosting, and deleting—only to reinstall again a few weeks later.
Consent, Culture, and Safety
Now let’s talk about safety—especially for women, queer people, and other vulnerable groups.
Dating apps don’t just bring potential lovers; they bring risk. There’s the fear of assault, of harassment, of being lured into unsafe situations. There’s the emotional manipulation that can stem from fake profiles or deceptive intentions. And there’s the normalisation of things like “love bombing” or “breadcrumbing” that make it harder to trust someone’s words.
While some apps have added safety features—like in-app panic buttons, background checks, or the ability to share date details with a friend—many users still rely on gut instinct. And gut instinct, as many have learned the hard way, isn’t always enough.
In Nigeria and many parts of Africa, the risks are even more layered. Economic inequality, patriarchal systems, and societal stigma around online dating often leave users more exposed. There have been heartbreaking cases of users being robbed or even killed after meeting matches through apps. For queer users, especially in places where homosexuality is criminalized, dating apps can become traps used by blackmailers or law enforcement.
So, yes—dating apps offer convenience and access. But they also operate in a moral grey area. What is the responsibility of a platform when its users are harmed? Can an algorithm ever really prioritise human dignity and safety?
Hookups, Hustles, and Digital Capital
Let’s be honest: many people are not just using dating apps for romance. They’re using them to network, to boost their online visibility, to seek financial support, or simply to escape boredom. In a world where “soft life” and “sugar daddy” culture trend alongside traditional notions of marriage and love, dating apps become transactional spaces.
This isn’t necessarily a bad thing. People have a right to define relationships on their own terms. But what happens when these platforms start to blur the lines between intimacy and influence, desire and desperation?
For some, dating becomes another form of hustle, especially in economies where job opportunities are scarce. This has led to the rise of subtle (and not-so-subtle) monetisation of attention, where companionship becomes part of the informal economy. It’s not unlike how content creators monetise their presence on Instagram or TikTok—except here, the “content” is a human connection.
This raises ethical questions: when does agency turn into exploitation? Who is empowered by these platforms, and who is left more vulnerable?
Redefining Relationships in a Digital Age
Despite all these challenges, dating apps are not inherently evil. They’ve helped people find love across borders, religions, and cultures. They’ve enabled connections that would have been impossible a generation ago. Some couples who met on Tinder are now married with children. Others found friendships, collaborators, or unexpected companionships.
But to build a healthier culture around these platforms, we need to get honest about what we’re looking for—and what we’re sacrificing.
We need to ask ourselves:
- Are we using these apps to connect or to distract?
- Are we seeking pleasure or validation?
- Are we honouring the humanity of the people we match with?
Dating apps thrive on fast engagement and quick rewards, but real intimacy is slow, vulnerable, and inconvenient. It can’t be swiped into existence.
So, Where Do We Go From Here?
First, we need better education—especially for young users. People should learn how to spot red flags, how to set boundaries, how to say no, and how to ask for what they want. Schools don’t teach digital intimacy, but they should.
Second, tech companies must do more. It’s not enough to optimize for engagement—they must design for safety, equity, and emotional wellbeing. Ethical design isn’t just about UX; it’s about care.
Third, as individuals, we need to resist the commodification of human connection. We must remind ourselves that behind every profile is a real person, with a heart, a history, and hopes. That’s not a moral argument—it’s a survival one.
In the End, Love is Still a Risk
Dating has always been risky. But tech has changed the stakes. It’s made it easier to find someone, but harder to know them. It’s made us more connected, but not always more caring.
And yet, despite everything, we keep swiping—because somewhere deep down, we still believe in the magic of being seen, chosen, and understood.
Maybe that’s what makes us human. Maybe that’s what tech can never fully replicate.
So, next time you open that app, pause. Reflect. Swipe, but with kindness. Match, but with care. Love, if you can, with your full heart—not just your thumb.
Have you had a meaningful (or messy) experience with dating apps? I’d love to hear your story. Share your thoughts below or send a message. Let’s keep this conversation real.
Read Also: swipe-chat-ghost-how-tech-fuels-hookup-culture-among-singles/
